Giant Mine Remediation Project - EA0809-001
Document List - Terms of Reference and workplans
This is a revised workplan for the Giant EA, updated to reflect the current status of the environmental assessment as of November 2011.
This is a revised workplan for the Giant EA, updated to reflect the actual Developer's Assessment Report submission date and timing considerations related to information requests. Updates to the information request process are included.
This document is the Workplan for the environmental assessment of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
This document is the Terms of Reference for the environmental assessment of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
This is the covering letter for the Terms of Reference and Workplan documents for the environmental assessment of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
These are the comments of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans on the Draft Terms of Reference for the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
These are the comments of the developer (INAC) on the Draft Terms of Reference for the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
These are the comments of Kevin O'Reilly on the Draft Terms of Reference for the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
Comments on this draft document are due on April 9, 2009. They can be submitted to Tawanis Testart by <a href="mailto:ttestart@reviewboard.ca"> email </a> or by fax at (867) 766-7074. The cover letter, with further instructions, for this document is attac
Comments on this draft document are due on April 9, 2009. They can be submitted to Tawanis Testart by <a href="mailto:ttestart@reviewboard.ca"> email </a> or by fax at (867) 766-7074.
Comments from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation-Land and Environment Department on the draft workplan.
This letter includes comments from the developer on the draft workplan.
This email includes comments on the draft workplan from the North Slave Metis Alliance, including comments regarding participant funding.
This letter from Kevin O'Reilly includes comments on the draft workplan, comments on participant funding and general comments on the Giant. It also includes an attachment referring to funding requests from a past project regarding public participation.