Pine Point Pilot Project - EA0607-002 [2006]
8 MBDeveloper's Response to IR#55
Tamerlane Ventures' response to IR#55, with a variety of clarifications on commitments made by the developer during the course of the Pine Point Pilot Project EA.
| Received: | Nov 2, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Developer |
| Public Registry: | 242 |
0.1 MBIR#55 - cover material
Cover letter and IR#55 from MVEIRB to the developer, regarding requests for clarification on a draft commitment table (NOTE: COMMITMENTS TABLE PROVIDED AS SEPARATE DOCUMENT ON PUBLIC REGISTRY).
| Received: | Oct 31, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Review Board |
| Public Registry: | 238 |
0.9 MBIR55 - Draft Commitments Table
Part of IR#55 from the MVEIRB to the developer, asking for clarification as necessary of commitments by the developer identified from the public registry.
| Received: | Oct 31, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Review Board |
| Public Registry: | 237 |
0.09 MBINAC response to IR 42 on closure and reclamation policy
Response, received on September 11, 2007, of IR42 from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. Their response addresses what provisions in current reclamation bonding protects the people of the Mackenzie Valley from environmental and financial costs associate
| Received: | Sep 14, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Parties/Public |
| Public Registry: | 193 |
0.04 MBsupplemental response to IR37 on flood risk associated with rail loadout facility
Supplemental response to second round IR 37, detailing the flood risk level associated with the ore loadout facility, and mitigations in construction of the facility to prevent flooding.
| Received: | Sep 14, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Developer |
| Public Registry: | 195 |
1 MBSupplemental response to IR46 on basal inflows
Additional information from the developer on basal inflows to the mine, as required in IR46 submitted by INAC.
| Received: | Sep 11, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Developer |
| Public Registry: | 196 |
0.3 MBSupplemental response to IR47
Supplemental information from the developer outlining how an "injection well" works, with examples.
| Received: | Sep 11, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Developer |
| Public Registry: | 194 |
2 MBSupplemental response to IR49
MSDS sheets supplied by the developer for all new reagents planned for use in the additional froth flotation circuit of the ore beneficiation process.
| Received: | Sep 11, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Developer |
| Public Registry: | 192 |
1 MBTamerlane Response to IRs 35 and 38
Response from Tamerlane Ventures on Second Round IRs 35 and 38. IR 35 response is especially important for consideration because it identifies components of the proposed development that have changed since the issuance of the Developer's Assessment Report
| Received: | Aug 31, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Developer |
| Public Registry: | 187 |
0.07 MBDKFN questions about Injection wells
A question posed for the public record by the Deninu Kue First Nation on August 23, 2007, related to the need for more information about the proposed "Injection Well" water discharge system. Subsequent discussions between Review Board and DKFN staff hav
| Received: | Aug 24, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Parties/Public |
| Public Registry: | 183 |
3 MBTamerlane partial Second Round IR responses
Second Round IR responses received from Tamerlane Ventures on August 15, 2007. Responses to IR # 35 and #38 are not included, and some other IRs cite forthcoming information. The Review Board has requested better quality map images to accompany this infor
| Received: | Aug 20, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Developer |
| Public Registry: | 175 |
1 MBArticle 1 of 4 on boom bust effects -
Article #1 of four referred to in IR responses #16 and #39 from Tamerlane Ventures, on potential for boom-bust effects and strategies for avoiding. Citation: Government of Canada (June 2006). From Restless Communities to Resilient Places: Building a
| Received: | Aug 16, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Review Board |
| Public Registry: | 176 |
3 MBArticle 2 of 4 on boom bust effects
Citation: Infrastructure Canada (November 2005). Northern Communities: Boom Bust and the Role of Infrastructure. Ministry of Municipal and Community Affairs, Government of the Northwest Territories.
| Received: | Aug 16, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Review Board |
| Public Registry: | 177 |
0.2 MBArticle 3 of 4 on boom bust effects
Citation: Infrastructure Canada (February 2006). Planning for a Soft Landing: Non-renewable Resource Development and Community Infrastructure in the Northwest Territories. A Research Backgrounder Prepared for the Experts Workshop on Northern Communitie
| Received: | Aug 16, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Review Board |
| Public Registry: | 178 |
4 MBArticle 4 of 4 on boom bust effects
Case study communities and bibliographic sources included. Citation: Western Economic Diversification Canada (2006). The Resilient City: Hope for Resource-based Communities.
| Received: | Aug 16, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Review Board |
| Public Registry: | 179 |
0.1 MBSecond Round of IR's
Please find attached the 2nd Round of Information Requests issued by the MVEIRB for EA0607-002 to the developer and parties. IR's 35-43 are directly from the MVEIRB; IR's 44-54 were proposed by other parties. In some cases, the MVEIRB will have slightly
| Received: | Aug 13, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Review Board |
| Public Registry: | 174 |
0.08 MBFort Resolution Metis Council letter with proposed issues for consideration as IRs
Letter of August 9, 2007 from the FRMC to the Review Board identifying two general areas of concern that they feel merit further study: Woodland Caribou and impacts of mining on water and aquatic life in the Great Slave Lake near the proposed project.
| Received: | Aug 10, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Parties/Public |
| Public Registry: | 172 |
0.1 MBEC-GWNT letter describing rationale for air quality IR
correspondence from Environment Canada and the GNWT related to their opinion on the need for site specific air quality assessment
| Received: | Aug 9, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Parties/Public |
| Public Registry: | 171 |
0.1 MBProposed 2nd Round IRs from GNWT
Proposed 2nd Round IRs, received August 8, 2007 from the GNWT. Questions relating to training and contingency planning for water disposal in case of a fault in the injection well system. PLEASE NOTE: THESE ARE NOT OFFICIAL 2ND ROUND INFORMATION REQUESTS.
| Received: | Aug 8, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Parties/Public |
| Public Registry: | 168 |
0.03 MBEnvironment Canada comments on 2nd round IRs and need for public hearings
Comments received by the Review Board on August 7, 2007, from Environment Canada, stating a need for IRs on air quality issues, and making comments on the need for public hearings versus written submissions.
| Received: | Aug 7, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Parties/Public |
| Public Registry: | 165 |
0.2 MBINAC proposed 2nd round IRs
Proposed 2nd round IRs received from INAC on August 7, 2007. PLEASE NOTE: THESE ARE NOT OFFICIAL 2ND ROUND INFORMATION REQUESTS. THE REVIEW BOARD WILL RELEASE THE OFFICIAL 2ND ROUND INFORMATION REQUESTS AFTER MEETING AUGUST 9.
| Received: | Aug 7, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Parties/Public |
| Public Registry: | 167 |
0.1 MBMVEIRB to parties to EA re: public hearing and information requests
Notification of the Review Boards reconsideration of need for Public Hearing and issuance of 2nd round of IR's.
| Received: | Jul 30, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Review Board |
| Public Registry: | 164 |
0.2 MBList of concerns about the Developer's Assessment Report - Fort Resolution Metis Council
A list of concerns arising from the Fort Resolution Metis Council's analysis of the PPPP Developer's Assessment Report. Issues related to freezewall and water will likely be discussed during the forthcoming Technical Sessions; for other issues (SARA speci
| Received: | Jul 6, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Parties/Public |
| Public Registry: | 146 |
0.6 MBINAC response to first round IR 32
Response from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada to First Round IR #32, relating to update on status of historic Pine Point mining area, and any studies known of impacts of Pine Point mine on local/regional water quality.
| Received: | Jun 14, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Parties/Public |
| Public Registry: | 130 |
0.3 MBTamerlane Additional info on IR 19 response
Additional information provided by Tamerlane to support the response to IR 19 on details behind the preliminary laboratory bench-scale process water discharge analyses.
| Received: | Jun 14, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Developer |
| Public Registry: | 132 |
0.04 MBGNWT response to IR 34
Response from GNWT on IR0607-002-34, referring to updating of Guidelines for Dust Suppression.
| Received: | Jun 11, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Parties/Public |
| Public Registry: | 128 |
4 MBFirst Round Information Responses from Tamerlane Ventues
Tamerlane Ventures Inc._Ts response to the first round of of Information Requests
| Received: | May 29, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Developer |
| Public Registry: | 120 |
0.04 MBFirst Round IR#33 - MMER applicability - Environment Canada response
Response to First Round IR #33 by Environment Canada, in which the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations are not considered to apply to the PPPP.
| Received: | May 18, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Parties/Public |
| Public Registry: | 117 |
1 MBFirst Round Information Requests
First Round of Information Requests from the Review Board to the developer and parties. Responses required by Wednesday, June 13, 2007.
| Received: | May 15, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Document Date: | Unknown |
| Originator: | Review Board |
| Public Registry: | 116 |
Total Number of Documents: 29
Web Feed: Documents for this project and scope